papers

Media’s Fascination with the Fallen Woman

There are a million and one viewpoints about the media and the acquittal of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito. I’m not blogging about the about the inevitable media cock ups or Twitter gun-jumping (why MUST people be first on Twitter?), most entertainingly the Daily Mail, but more about the emphasis throughout on Knox, not Sollecito, or even the guy who’s actually serving time. Do you even know his name?

Here’s the rub in this whole sorry Keystone Kops-like affair. Had Knox not been physically attractive, young and female, then this whole media circus would have been more of a one-man juggling act. Why wasn’t Sollecito more interesting? Nah, no media fodder there.

You get these cases every so often. Remember Joanna Lees of the Falconio case? Young woman accused of murder and her private life dragged out in public. Storytellers throughout history have loved the angle of the (apparently) fallen woman, right from Eve through Salome to, well, Knox. She’s the latest in this line.

Unlike many others though, Knox is now free to make a fortune. Opportunity Knox.

 

 

Compare and Contrast: British Airways versus Virgin

Have you noticed how the long-from TV ad is back? So much for TV ads being dead, the last couple of weeks have seen lengthy TV ad campaigns by the likes of British Airways, Virgin Atlantic and John Lewis, the aim being to really sink the message into our minds. Succeeding each time, I’d argue.

But it’s the British Airways versus Virgin Atlantic campaign that really interests me. No sooner does BA unveil its £20 million “Aviators” campaign than Virgin brings back its long-form “Your airline’s either got it or it hasn’t” to counter.

What I really find interesting is how both ads directly reflect both companies’ respective cultures. British Airways plays on its history, experience, the glamour of Heathrow Terminal 5 and drags up the ever-popular (but retired) Concorde. Virgin is edgy, Bond-like, modern, humorous and sexy. Both perfectly tee up what the customer can expect from the experience.

I like them both, I fly with both, and I think the competition is good for customers and TV viewers alike.

British Airways’ new “Aviators” ad:


 

 

community

Madder Men and Women

Are genuine digital media pros today’s rock stars? At the risk of sounding like a generic Silicon Valley press release I’m excited – ridiculously excited – every day about working in digital. It’s a weird buzz to feel in an otherwise flat economy, but working in social media I get the feeling on a daily basis that I’m a part of an almost revolutionary movement.

Everyone in marketing’s watched Mad Men – sit in the fifties heyday of adverting, with all its associated excitement and decadence – but I think the social revolution is living up to something equally, if not more, exciting. “Mad” stood for Madison Avenue in New York, where the Mad Men worked, but if it were an indication of their mental state, then I’d venture that nowadays we’re altogether madder men and women.

Advertising in the fifties and sixties endured far less scrutiny and cynicism than marketing, advertising and PR do in the consumer-enlightened era of today. Things also didn’t move at the speed of light, like they do now. Mad Men had a couple of channels to play with: Print and television. Marketers today have those above-the-line channels plus the Web, with its ever changing social networks, platforms and algorithms to take into account and conquer.

That means we need to be ever more creative and innovative to remain engaged and relevant. I was a fledgling tech journalist during the dotcom boom with its parties, exotic press junkets and rapidly-evolving technologies. Now is reminiscent but so much more varied and fun. There are some cracking agencies, wonderfully-gifted individuals, an incredible creative pulse and some truly amazing work coming out. So, today I salute the madder men and women that make each day so damn awesome. Long may it continue.

 

hops

Thoughts on Regional Branding

The author marvelling at some lovely Kent hops

A certain leading supermarket change has annoyed me this week in what to most people would be an otherwise innocuous observation and got me thinking about how things are branded regionally and who decides these things.

My beef is the humble strawberry. And a geography lesson. There I am in this leading supermarket in the strawberry section and the choice I face is whether to pick the “British” strawberries from Kent, or the “Scottish” strawberries.

Firstly, the geography lesson – GET IT RIGHT: if you’re going to have “Scottish” strawberries complete with flag of St Andrew, at least have “English” strawberries with the flag of St George as an alternative and not “British” strawberries (with Union Flag) in the same batch as the Scots…who are also British.

Secondly, as someone from Royal Tunbridge Wells, I take great umbrage that the greatest brand in strawberries – nay, UK fruit in general – has been overlooked here. Kent strawberries are the best in the world, that’s why they’re served up at Wimbledon. That’s part of the reason we’re called “The Garden of England”, because the soil and the weather’s so damn good that fruit thrives here.

Dickens knew it: “Kent, sir – everybody knows Kent – apples, cherries, hops and women.” (The Pickwick Papers), as did the Sussex village of Lamberhurst, which jumped borders into Kent to sell its hops at a higher price by branding them as Kent hops.

Supermarkets: if you’re going to brand things regionally, do it right. Scotland’s rightly famous for many things, but its strawberries don’t trump those from the Garden. And while we’re at it, do they really grow tea in Yorkshire…?

 

WWW

With Internet marketing, less is often more

Over-familiarity can breed contempt, whether on- or off-line. In the same way that ‘selling is repelling’ is a great mantra for social media marketing, so “over-familiarity breeds contempt” should be front of mind for those exercising the apparently healthy art of email marketing, yet this appears to be a message that few email marketers seem to grasp.

A look at my spam folder shows me that:

  • The host of one of my websites has sent me two emails this week offering an “exclusive” promotional code for something I don’t want
  • An online shoe retailer has emailed me EVERY DAY with reminders of their X%-off sale
  • Numerous other monthly “newsletters” (often just sales spiel with little informative, engaging content) which I seem to have got myself signed up for

The worst offender is, of course, the daily email from the online shoe vendor. Seriously, guys, how many shoes do you expect the regular punter to buy? Try Imelda Marcos, folks, you might have more luck.

I recommend any would-be email marketer checks out the Target Internet podcast, as these guys impart some great common sense when it comes to email marketing. Email marketing conversion is hard enough as us consumers are pretty clued up and cynical nowadays. This means you need to offer more than a daily door thump of offers.